Spanning tree has given me more business than anything else these last few
weeks...it's amazing what enabling port-fast can do for your
macintosh/novell network!!!

:)

-Brad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> Your understanding is correct, as far as the information you've given
goes.
> However, presumably you are running multiple VLANs in this setup?
> If you are using per-VLAN spanning tree, you have a separate spanning tree
for
> each VLAN.  You can set 6500a to be the root bridge for some of the VLANs,
and
> 6500b to be the root bridge for the other VLANs.  Then, although each
particular
> spanning tree uses one switch, your total traffic will be balanced across
both.
> If one falls over, spanning tree for the affected VLANs swaps across to
the
> remaining 6500.
>
> Anyway, whether it's a waste of dollars to have a switch sitting there in
case
> of failure depends on how much the failure will cost you if the second
switch
> isn't there :-)
>
> JMcL
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/08/2000
04:26 pm
> ---------------------------
>
>
> "Rick Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 16/08/2000 01:23:36 pm
>
> Please respond to "Rick Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:    (bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
> Subject:  STP
>
>
>
> I have a question on Spanning tree across the core layer. If I have switch
> stacks that look like the following diagram:
>
> 2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924
> 2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924
> 2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924
> 2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924    2924
>
> 5000    5000    5000    5000    5000    5000    5000    5000    5000
>
>                             6500a                    6500b
>
> If I have two links going to each 6500 from the 5000s and the 6500a switch
> is the root bridge, then is 6500b switch even going to be used. From my
> understanding of STP, all traffic is going to go through the root bridge
in
> the even of redundant paths. If this is true then (not that I am downing
> fault tolerance) it is a waste of a switch that costs thousands of dollars
> just to sit there and wait for the 6500a switch to go down. Am I getting
> this correct or is there a way to setup STP so both 6500s get used with
> about the same load?
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---


___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to