On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Julian Eccli wrote:
> Brian: What was your point? You said the exact same thing as Jin.
he mentioned longest match but didn't actually say the route he was
pointing to null was in fact more specific, I was just clarifying.
he also didn't mention if he was nailing this route with a high AD, so I
wanted to clarify. I mean, if you just make a static route to null0 for
say a /24 which is on one of your interfaces, then yeah thats a bad thing
of course, I just wanted to verify it had a high AD.
>
>
> Jin: Escalate the issue. You possibly contacted 1st tier support.
>
> What you requested should be allowed unless their is something in your
> peering arrangement that does not provision for this.
>
> Push as hard as you need to for your answer since you are a customer of
> theirs and that means you are royalty!
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Julian
>
> --
> Julian Eccli
> Technical Support Engineer
> Juniper Networks
>
> "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Jin Tam wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone here peer with Verizon or work for the NOC. These guys are
> > > telling me that I can't advertise an address block that doesn't belong
> to
> > > them. So, what the hell is the point of a BGP session if I can't
> advertise
> > > the same address through 2 or more providers. Also, I pointed my
> advertised
> > > address at Null0 so that there would be a route in the table. They are
> > > telling me that all the traffic will be dropped at the router. I had to
> >
> > well it would, except that:
> >
> > 1. you are no doubt pointing an aggregate to null0, and the actual routes
> > which have meaning are more specific.
> > 2. you are using a high administrative distance on that route
> >
> > > explain to their networking team about the longest match rule. Are these
> > > guys hiring high school grads for the NOC team?
> > >
> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> > > _________________________________
> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Network Administrator
> > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
> >
> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> > _________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
