The key is to answer the question. A supernet route refers to a single
route rather than the complete set of aggregate routes. While Geoff is
correct and technically more accurate, the better answer belongs to Thangs
who is also correct.
>From: "A. Geoffrey Cauchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "A. Geoffrey Cauchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "thangs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Summarization
>Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:39:20 +0200
>
>172.16.1.0/22 is not correct. 172.16.0.0/22 would be the correct syntax,
>but since the 172.16.0.0 is not included, I would aggregate these 3
>networks
>as:
>
>172.16.1.0
>172.16.2.0/23
>
>
>Geoff
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "thangs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 10:22 PM
>Subject: Re: Summarization
>
>
> > I feel the summarized supernet route should be 172.16.1.0/22
> >
> > from the below fig ..its clear that the no of common bits in the MSB
>part
>is
> > 22
> >
> > |
> > If you expand 172.16.1.0 in bin ----->10110110.00010000.000000
>|01.00000000
> > 172.16.2.0 in bin------>10110110.00010000.000000
> > |10.00000000
> > 172.16.3.0 in bin------>10110110.00010000.000000
> > |10.00000000
> >
> > |
> >
> > Thanks
> > Thangavel
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > |
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 3:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: Summarization
> >
> >
> > > In a message dated 10/19/00 4:33:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > There are 3 contiguous networks:
> > > > 172.16.1.0/24
> > > > 172.16.2.0/24
> > > > 172.16.3.0/24
> > > > What is the supernet ?
> > > > Is it 172.16.1.0/22 ? Would you pls explain to me ?
> > > >
> > > > TIA,
> > > >
> > >
> > > That is not the supernet because 172.16.2.0 does not have a common bit
> > place
> > > in 172.16.1.0/22. I believe that this would be superneted to
> > 172.16.0.0/16.
> > > This is where I see them all matching up that is. It would be real
>hard
> > for
> > > me to explain this so I'll let someone else do that who is more
> > experienced
> > > with this. Hope I helped a little.
> > >
> > > Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA, 1/4-NP
> > > <A HREF="mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
> > >
> > > "If you need luck, apparently you're not prepared...Go study!"
> > >
> > > ~Mark Zabludovsky~
> > >
> > > _________________________________
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
