I beleive Geoff is right.
Thanks
Thangavel
----- Original Message -----
From: A. Geoffrey Cauchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: thangs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: Summarization
> 172.16.1.0/22 is not correct. 172.16.0.0/22 would be the correct syntax,
> but since the 172.16.0.0 is not included, I would aggregate these 3
networks
> as:
>
> 172.16.1.0
> 172.16.2.0/23
>
>
> Geoff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "thangs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 10:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Summarization
>
>
> > I feel the summarized supernet route should be 172.16.1.0/22
> >
> > from the below fig ..its clear that the no of common bits in the MSB
part
> is
> > 22
> >
> > |
> > If you expand 172.16.1.0 in bin ----->10110110.00010000.000000
> |01.00000000
> > 172.16.2.0 in bin------>10110110.00010000.000000
> > |10.00000000
> > 172.16.3.0 in bin------>10110110.00010000.000000
> > |10.00000000
> >
> > |
> >
> > Thanks
> > Thangavel
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > |
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 3:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: Summarization
> >
> >
> > > In a message dated 10/19/00 4:33:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > There are 3 contiguous networks:
> > > > 172.16.1.0/24
> > > > 172.16.2.0/24
> > > > 172.16.3.0/24
> > > > What is the supernet ?
> > > > Is it 172.16.1.0/22 ? Would you pls explain to me ?
> > > >
> > > > TIA,
> > > >
> > >
> > > That is not the supernet because 172.16.2.0 does not have a common bit
> > place
> > > in 172.16.1.0/22. I believe that this would be superneted to
> > 172.16.0.0/16.
> > > This is where I see them all matching up that is. It would be real
hard
> > for
> > > me to explain this so I'll let someone else do that who is more
> > experienced
> > > with this. Hope I helped a little.
> > >
> > > Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA, 1/4-NP
> > > <A HREF="mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
> > >
> > > "If you need luck, apparently you're not prepared...Go study!"
> > >
> > > ~Mark Zabludovsky~
> > >
> > > _________________________________
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
