thanks for the comments - the list is awfully slow lately.......... I have already turned off sync (no synchronization) and that seems to have put the routes into the table. This is a good example of where reading the book definitely doesn't give you the same warm and fuzzy as doing it "hands on". Kevin Wigle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 3:24 PM Subject: Re: iBGP > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Kevin Wigle wrote: > > > Dear Group, > > > > Doing BGP stuff in the lab now and I'm having a problem getting iBGP routes > > into the routing table. > > > > After fixing up the problems getting neighbors talking properly, I cannot > > see BGP routes. > > > > All the routes are from loop-backs on 4 routers in a full mesh. > > > > The routes being advertised are not being advertised by another igp. > > > > I'm also looking at the Hutnick/Satterlee book which takes you by the hand > > but I'm not getting the same results. It states there are 2 conditions to > > be met to get routes into the routing table. > > > > BGP knows about the routes through the network command - condition #1 > > > > The routes do show up on their local router as "directly connected" and > > therefore are in the local ip routing table. - Condition 2 > > > > All routes show up in all routers in the bgp table on every router. > > do they show "invalid"............is it a invalid next-hop? Is > "next-hop-self" set? > > > > > I'm now looking at next-hop-self, but so far it didn't seem to help. > > ok > > > > > The book's examples end up with a local pref of 0 whereas mine shows 100, > > not sure of the significance. > > Don't worry about that. Is sync turned on? If you're not a transit AS, I > would turn it off. > > > > > A colleague mentioned iBGPs high admin distance (200) was keeping the routes > > out ...... but the routes are not being advertised by any other means except > > iBGP - so....... shouldn't they be there?? > > Well yes, and if an IGP was keeping them out, at least you would have the > IGP route, and you say you have no route, so thats not it. > > > > > Anyway, short of posting configs - any quick ideas? (long ones too will be > > tried) > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ----------------------------------------------- > Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Administrator > ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
