You know, this is one of those things that really annoys me. The 1750
would be a *perfect* lab router if it could do 802.1q on the fast ethernet
interface. Is this a hardware limitation or a software limitation?
Of course, add 802.1q to the 1700 and the capabilities of the 1700 begin to
encroach on 2600 territory, so I suspect that the lack of trunking is a
conscious decision intended to distinguish between models.
Ben
At 12:19 PM +0200 12/23/00, Elias Aggelidis wrote:
>IT DOES NOT SUPPORT TRUNKS !
>Only 26xx and 36xx can do it !
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mark Krysinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:58 PM
>Subject: ISL
>
>
>> Does anyone know if you can use a 1750 with a 10/100 port in place of a 2600
>> series router for ISL?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Mark
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
