Cisco is in business to make money. There is good solid history that
companies make more money by selling higher end things with higher margins.
No Cisco does not want to migrate a wealth of features to their lower end
equipment, because this will cannibalize their sales and their margins.
Yeah it ticks me off as well. I don't want to have to spend major bucks to
equip a study lab. But from a business standpoint, it makes perfect sense.
Besides which, as long as Cisco can do so, that means better job
opportunities for me and my employer.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben
Hockenhull
Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 11:51 AM
To: Elias Aggelidis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL
You know, this is one of those things that really annoys me. The 1750
would be a *perfect* lab router if it could do 802.1q on the fast ethernet
interface. Is this a hardware limitation or a software limitation?
Of course, add 802.1q to the 1700 and the capabilities of the 1700 begin to
encroach on 2600 territory, so I suspect that the lack of trunking is a
conscious decision intended to distinguish between models.
Ben
At 12:19 PM +0200 12/23/00, Elias Aggelidis wrote:
>IT DOES NOT SUPPORT TRUNKS !
>Only 26xx and 36xx can do it !
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mark Krysinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:58 PM
>Subject: ISL
>
>
>> Does anyone know if you can use a 1750 with a 10/100 port in place of a
2600
>> series router for ISL?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Mark
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
