I realize that it lets you do it, but the rule (which of course I have no
proof of existance) is that pointing a route out of an interface which is
not point-to-point and has multiple nodes, can lead to confusion in some
instances. I have had it where it also did not work also.
andy
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> To which rule are you referring?
>
> Router_2(config)#ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ?
> A.B.C.D Forwarding router's address
> Ethernet IEEE 802.3
> Loopback Loopback interface
> Null Null interface
> Serial Serial
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy
> Walden
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 10:01 AM
> To: Stull, Cory
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: ip route question
>
>
> That is the rule. I will say that when there was only one device on the
> ethernet I have done it accidently and it worked though.
>
> andy
>
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Stull, Cory wrote:
>
> >
> > I know I'm showing my ignorance here but I'm tired of trying to find the
> > answer on CCO. Must be looking in the wrong places.
> >
> >
> > I just saw a Boson question asking about ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 int
> > ethernet0
> >
> >
> > I thought you could only point static routes like that out of point to
> point
> > interfaces? For example: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 int ser0
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cory
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
