Can you say....... "split horizon".... This is one the issues you must
identify when configuring
distance-vector protocols over frame-relay. If you're FR topology was full
mesh this wouldn't
be a problem because all devices would have a direct(pvc) connection to the
other device.
However, in the HUB and spoke topology the only way around this is to use
p-t-p interfaces
at the hub site(of course you'd have to define separate networks on each
interface). Of just
disable split-horizon...
Nigel..
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 6:44 PM
Subject: Rip over frame issue
> I am having an issue with RIP over Frame-relay.
> I have 3 routers in the lab, with one setup as a Frame-relay switch.
> The issue is as follows:
> Router 1 is running RIP with networks 172.16.0.0 (LB0) and 193.1.1.0 (S
0/0)
> This router is sending/recieving updates, however these updates are being
> placed in the routing table.
>
> Router 3 is running RIP with the same networks as Router 1. Also, the
router
> is sending/receiving updats, but no routes appearing in the table.
>
> I am just curios as to why updates are being sent/received but not added
to
> the table.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
