Very useful! Thank You.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Pierre-Alex; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Cisco
Subject: RE: SNMP versus RMON


Hi,

I have found RMON more useful as a trouble shooting tool particularly on
switches.  Non Cisco equipment (Cabletron, 3Com and the like) often have
RMON available.  You can usually get into these without any special MIBs and
get into the raffic analysis.

RMON allows you to more easily find who and what could be causing congestion
or traffic problems than does SNMP.  Be caeful however RMON is quite CPU
intensive when turned on a device.  For example, you can expect a 2500
series router to pack it in within a minute or two if you decide RMON should
be on to discover a problem.  The best way is to get some other device to
get the RMON stuff for you.  An RMON Probe.

You can use RMON Probes on remote sites to do all sorts of useful traffic
analysis the SNMP wont give you.

Just some thoughts

Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia


On Monday, January 08, 2001 at 10:52:01 AM, Pierre-Alex wrote:

>
> Thanks Willy!
>
> Pierre-Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Willy Schoots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 10:20 AM
> To: Pierre-Alex
> Subject: RE: SNMP versus RMON
>
>
> RMON gives you a lot more network traffic information than SNMP does. With
> FULL RMON capabilities you can even sniff packets of the interface save
them
> and send them to a remote analyst station. There is definetly some overlap
> but RMON is more powerful if you want to troubleshoot specific traffic
> problems.
>
> Have a look at www.netscout.com for more info on RMON and its applications
> Cheers,
>
> Willy Schoots
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Pierre-Alex
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 5:06 PM
> To: Cisco
> Subject: SNMP versus RMON
>
>
> Please pardon my ignorance.
>
> Why did Cisco invent RMON?
>
> SNMP seems to do exactly the same job (i.e. it provides information on all
> aspects of the network).
>
> I must be missing something ...
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
www.tasmail.com



_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to