I was looking into this Cisco/non-Cisco switch issue just recently and was
told that the 802.1q standard stipulates only 1 x STP, and yet with Cisco's
802.1q implementation you can have per vlan STP (not quite matching the
802.1q standard). Perhaps someone in the group can clear this issue up for
us.
Steve
"Piatnitchi Cristian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Rico
>
> Take care ! I had many problems with set up a STP, trunking and
> 802.1q between Cisco 5000 and Bay Networks.
> I gave up because finally I used just 1 link between these devices.
> I was surprised to see that FastEtherChannel on Cisco means trunking on
> Bays'.
> This is what somebody from CISCO staff suggested to me.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Washington Rico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 4:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: VTP Protocal Cisco 5000 and 3com Superstack II 1100
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I wonder if anyone knows if it is possible to trunk a 3com Superstack II
> 1100 with a Cisco 5000 serious switch. 3com switch is the client and
> recieving vlan info from Cisco5000? If it is possible which Trunking
> Protocal should be used?
>
> I appreciate the help...
>
> Rico
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
