This is the first time BGP has ever run on this router, and I had the weight
parameter configured before I allowed any routes in. After changing my
route map to allow partial routes, I did a soft incoming reset. Might that
have something to do with it somehow? Before the reset, there were no BGP
routes on the router at all (except in the soft reconfiguration cache.)
Strange, huh?
> If you did not use "clear ip bgp *" to reset the BGP connection, then any
> existing routes that were in the BGP table before adding the weight
> parameter to the neighbor command, would be left at the default of 0 for
> routes learned from the neighbor.
>
> Reset the BGP connection (**AFTER HOURS ON THE WEEKEND OF COURSE!**).
>
> At 02:18 PM 1/10/01 -0800, John Neiberger wrote:
> >We have two connections to ISPs, but only one is running BGP at this
moment
> >(waiting for Verio to get off of their hineys.) I have "neighbor
x.x.x.x
> >weight 1000" configured for my lone peer. When I do "show ip bgp",
> >shouldn't every single route have a weight of 1000?
> >
> >I have no other peers so shouldn't that weight command set all routes to
> >1000? In actuality, very few are set to 1000; most are set to zero. I
> >haven't been able to figure out why this might be happening.
> >
> >Any ideas?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________________
> >Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> >http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
> >
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
