Eric,
     Well in the example I'm working on there's 3 routers on the same 
ethenrnet segment. I'm trying if possible to keep them all on the same 
broadcast segment. This would mean I would have to stand-up 2 tunnels on 
each device to support what I'm trying to do. This seems to be quickly 
becoming a configuration nightmare...Exactly how much ISIS is on the lab.. 
:-)

It's worth a try...

Nigel..




>From: "Eric Fairfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,        "Cisco Group Study" 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,        "CCIE_Lab Group Study" 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....
>Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:04:25 -0600
>
>If using a multipoint FR interface IS-IS will not work.  Create a tunnel
>between the two routers.  Works for me!
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Nigel Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Cisco Group Study <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; CCIE_Lab Group Study
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 3:11 AM
>Subject: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >            I'm just trying to get a handle on ISIS over frame relay.  It 
>=
> > would seem that because there's no comparable command to the "ip ospf =
> > network" under ISIS that this limits the configuration options over =
> > frame-relay.  It's noted that cisco serial interface with frame-relay =
> > encapsulation defaults to a multi-point interface. For some reason I =
> > can't get ISIS neighbor adjacencies being formed using a full mesh =
> > frame-relay cloud.=20
> >
> > I'm using the configuration example in Doyle's Routing TCP/IP, pg. 652.  
>=
> > I replaced the ethernet segment between the L2 devices(London, Rome, and 
>=
> > Brussels) with frame-relay.  In my frame-relay configurations I'm able =
> > to ping all points of the cloud but I'm unable to get adjacencies to =
> > form.  All routers are configured with physical interface(multi-point, =
> > being the default) but I still get encapsulation failure when observing 
>=
> > the "debug isis adj-packets".  Now I've got this to work when the =
> > devices are configured using  point-to-point sub-interfaces in a partial 
>=
> > mesh(hub and spoke topology) and the  hub configured for individual =
> > p-t-p's for each pvc.
> >
> > I am however trying to simulate the ethernet segment I'm replacing.. I'm 
>=
> > I thinking way "out the box" here or is this possible"
> >
> > For reference there's a basic example on pg. 678 of Doyle's book that =
> > covers the frame-relay issue I'm trying to resolve...
> >
> >
> > Thanks All,
> >
> > Nigel.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> > unsubscribe ccielab
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to