Unfortunately the LAB doesn't always give you the option.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Baumgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Eric Fairfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Nigel Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco Group Study <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
CCIE_Lab Group Study <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....
>
> Or use point-to-point subinterfaces.
>
> Kevin
>
> At 06:04 PM 1/12/01 -0600, Eric Fairfield wrote:
> >If using a multipoint FR interface IS-IS will not work. Create a tunnel
> >between the two routers. Works for me!
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Nigel Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Cisco Group Study <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; CCIE_Lab Group Study
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 3:11 AM
> >Subject: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....
> >
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > > I'm just trying to get a handle on ISIS over frame relay.
It =
> > > would seem that because there's no comparable command to the "ip ospf
=
> > > network" under ISIS that this limits the configuration options over =
> > > frame-relay. It's noted that cisco serial interface with frame-relay
=
> > > encapsulation defaults to a multi-point interface. For some reason I =
> > > can't get ISIS neighbor adjacencies being formed using a full mesh =
> > > frame-relay cloud.=20
> > >
> > > I'm using the configuration example in Doyle's Routing TCP/IP, pg.
652. =
> > > I replaced the ethernet segment between the L2 devices(London, Rome,
and =
> > > Brussels) with frame-relay. In my frame-relay configurations I'm able
=
> > > to ping all points of the cloud but I'm unable to get adjacencies to =
> > > form. All routers are configured with physical interface(multi-point,
=
> > > being the default) but I still get encapsulation failure when
observing =
> > > the "debug isis adj-packets". Now I've got this to work when the =
> > > devices are configured using point-to-point sub-interfaces in a
partial =
> > > mesh(hub and spoke topology) and the hub configured for individual =
> > > p-t-p's for each pvc.
> > >
> > > I am however trying to simulate the ethernet segment I'm replacing..
I'm =
> > > I thinking way "out the box" here or is this possible"
> > >
> > > For reference there's a basic example on pg. 678 of Doyle's book that
=
> > > covers the frame-relay issue I'm trying to resolve...
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks All,
> > >
> > > Nigel.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> > > unsubscribe ccielab
> > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________________
> >To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> >unsubscribe ccielab
>
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
