I would be surprised if the lab said you must using a "multipoint interface"
and not a point-to-point. Especially since ISIS is not support with this
type of interface.
Now it could say do ISIS using maybe using "multipoint interface" which
ever method that will work. The suggestion I guess of doing a tunnel seems
like the only way with this type of interface.
Kevin
At 08:00 PM 1/12/01 -0600, Eric Fairfield wrote:
>Unfortunately the LAB doesn't always give you the option.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Kevin Baumgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Eric Fairfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Nigel Taylor
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco Group Study <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>CCIE_Lab Group Study <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 6:55 PM
>Subject: Re: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....
>
>
> >
> > Or use point-to-point subinterfaces.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > At 06:04 PM 1/12/01 -0600, Eric Fairfield wrote:
> > >If using a multipoint FR interface IS-IS will not work. Create a tunnel
> > >between the two routers. Works for me!
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Nigel Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: Cisco Group Study <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; CCIE_Lab Group Study
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 3:11 AM
> > >Subject: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > I'm just trying to get a handle on ISIS over frame relay.
>It =
> > > > would seem that because there's no comparable command to the "ip ospf
>=
> > > > network" under ISIS that this limits the configuration options over =
> > > > frame-relay. It's noted that cisco serial interface with frame-relay
>=
> > > > encapsulation defaults to a multi-point interface. For some reason I =
> > > > can't get ISIS neighbor adjacencies being formed using a full mesh =
> > > > frame-relay cloud.=20
> > > >
> > > > I'm using the configuration example in Doyle's Routing TCP/IP, pg.
>652. =
> > > > I replaced the ethernet segment between the L2 devices(London, Rome,
>and =
> > > > Brussels) with frame-relay. In my frame-relay configurations I'm able
>=
> > > > to ping all points of the cloud but I'm unable to get adjacencies to =
> > > > form. All routers are configured with physical interface(multi-point,
>=
> > > > being the default) but I still get encapsulation failure when
>observing =
> > > > the "debug isis adj-packets". Now I've got this to work when the =
> > > > devices are configured using point-to-point sub-interfaces in a
>partial =
> > > > mesh(hub and spoke topology) and the hub configured for individual =
> > > > p-t-p's for each pvc.
> > > >
> > > > I am however trying to simulate the ethernet segment I'm replacing..
>I'm =
> > > > I thinking way "out the box" here or is this possible"
> > > >
> > > > For reference there's a basic example on pg. 678 of Doyle's book that
>=
> > > > covers the frame-relay issue I'm trying to resolve...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks All,
> > > >
> > > > Nigel.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________
> > > > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> > > > unsubscribe ccielab
> > > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________
> > >To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> > >unsubscribe ccielab
> >
> >
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
