I may be on to my own answer. I will add the information here in case it
comes up again. I have discovered that RJ connectors are actually defined in
the Code of Federal Regulations, which seems an odd place to me.
Specifically at Title 47 Chapter 1 Part 68, which is available online at
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_00/47cfr68_00.html
The relevant information appears to be in 68.500 and 68.502. I will be
reading these. If anyone has any other information, please let me know.
""Ken"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
93ouel$gnm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:93ouel$gnm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I found one thread in the archives on this general subject, but it did not
> entirely answer what I need to know. I need to know what the difference is
> between a RJ-45 and RJ-48 connectors. In particular are there physical
> dimension differences in the two. I have seen both used to connect a T1
> demarc to a CSU/DSU. But I have been told that the RJ-48 is slightly
> different than the RJ-45. As such the electrical contacts may not reliably
> match up and cause unexpected connection problems. So is there an actual
> physical difference in the two? If so, exactly what?
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
