>"Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  discoevered,



>I may be on to my own answer.  I will add the information here in case it
>comes up again. I have discovered that RJ connectors are actually defined in
>the Code of Federal Regulations, which seems an odd place to me.
>Specifically at Title 47 Chapter 1 Part 68, which is available online at
>http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_00/47cfr68_00.html

Frightening that I haven't thought about this for 25 years or so, but 
a bit of history may shed light on why you found these in an odd 
place.

RJ stands for Registered Jack. It appears in US regulatory literature 
as a consequence of the 1975 AT&T breakup and other actions such as 
the Carterfone Decision.  Prior to these, since The Phone Company 
owned everything, there was no need for a third-party vendor or for 
modularized customer interfaces.  With divestiture, however, the 
demarcation of responsibility between carrier and customer, or for 
third-party equipment to carrier, was needed.

While the RJ series had quite reasonable applications simply for 
wiring, legal pressures made them ubiquitous in the US.

>
>The relevant information appears to be in 68.500 and 68.502. I will be
>reading these. If anyone has any other information, please let me know.
>
>""Ken"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>93ouel$gnm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:93ouel$gnm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  I found one thread in the archives on this general subject, but it did not
>>  entirely answer what I need to know. I need to know what the difference is
>>  between a RJ-45 and RJ-48 connectors. In particular are there physical
>>  dimension differences in the two. I have seen both used to connect a T1
>>  demarc to a CSU/DSU. But I have been told that the RJ-48 is slightly
>>  different than the RJ-45. As such the electrical contacts may not reliably
>>  match up and cause unexpected connection problems. So is there an actual
>  > physical difference in the two? If so, exactly what?

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to