I have always been under the assumption that when you added static mappings
that inv arp was automatically disabled.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ronnie Royston
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 8:56 PM
To: 'Nigel Taylor'; Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group
Study
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Why wouldn't it? Inverse ARP is a dynamic mapping, 'frame map' command is a
static mapping.
If I remember correctly, You must disable inverse arp on the major interface
even if you have 'no frame inverse' on the point-to-multipoint subinterface
to actually disable it (is that what is suprising you, maybe?).
Frame inverse arp works for everything but point-to-point subinterfaces.
For these interface types, it is not needed.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 6:48 PM
To: Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group Study
Subject: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Hi All,
I was working through a number of frame relay lab and made =
some pretty cool observations. The big one being that I had Inverse-Arp =
working as well while using the "frame-map" command. Everything I know =
tells me this shouldn't be but it works.
I reloaded the routers and the Inverse arp worked. Even after shutting =
down the interface and bringing it back up the Inverse-Arp still worked. =
=20
Anyone got any thoughts on how this could be working....?
Nigel...
_______________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab
_______________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
