>At 03:37 PM 1/22/01, Jack Williams wrote: > >>The propagation delay for Ethernet must not be greater than 512 bit times or >>you'll get late collisions (as Tim said). Since the speed of light is >>constant and 10-baseT bits last 10 times longer than 100-baseT bits, that >>directly influences how long of a cable you can run! >> > >That sounded like Nonsense, didn't it? Non Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection. Didn't we just see an implementation in Florida? _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Alvarado Jesus
- RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Timothy Metz
- RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Watson, Rick, CTR, OUSDC
- FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Jack Williams
- Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Priscilla Oppenheimer
- Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Jack W. Williams
- Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Brian Lodwick
- Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Brian Lodwick
- Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Priscilla Oppenheimer
- RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Erik Mintz
- RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Priscilla Oppenheimer
- Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Tom Lisa
- Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Brian Lodwick
- Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Jack Williams
- Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU Brian Lodwick