In a message dated 1/23/01 7:32:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Or just do 'sh process cpu' on a router and see all > processes that needs cpu intervention . > > > flem > Good point, totally forgot about this...thanks. Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA, 3/4-NP <A HREF="mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> "Even if I knew I had only 1 more week to live, I would still schedule my CCIE lab. I would just have to work a little harder I guess. After all, without any goals in life, I'm dead already." ~Mark Zabludovsky~ _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: But isn't that the routers job??? J Roysdon
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Taylor, Don
- But isn't that the routers job??? jenny . mcleod
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Timothy Metz
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Brian Lodwick
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Brian Lodwick
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: But isn't that the routers job??? Flem
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? NeoLink2000
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Bolton, Travis
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: But isn't that the routers job??? Guy Tal
- Re: But isn't that the routers job??? Howard C. Berkowitz
- Multiple Central Site Routers Tim Lovelace
- Re: But isn't that the routers job?... Guy Tal
- Re: But isn't that the routers... Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Peter Van Oene
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Priscilla Oppenheimer
- RE: But isn't that the routers job??? Howard C. Berkowitz