If the cli don't give you the option you need then you
are running a version that does not support what you
wonna do .

Timed access list are not in 11.3 .
Upgrade ... upgrade ... .


flem

--- Srihari Babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having cisco2600 router.
> i want to configure timed access lists in that for
> giving internet permissions to users by time basis.
> any body can give me the solution for that?
> in this router 11.3 version IOS.
> but it is not taking time-rang, absolute and
> periodic
> commands.
> please give the solution
> 
> --- Cisco Certification Digest
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Cisco Certification Digest Thursday, February 1
> 2001
> > Volume 02 : Number 1001
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > In this issue of the Cisco Certification Mailing
> > List Digest:
> >     db9 to rj45 converter
> >     BGP Route Filtering
> >     RE: cd burner LAST
> >     route summarization in rip
> >     CAT6509 FLASH CARDS
> >     Cisco 4000 for sale
> >     RE: Require a jury's opinion as to the
> > correctness.
> >     RE: Frame Relay
> >     RE: CAT6509 FLASH CARDS
> >     Favorite Network Sniffer
> >     Re: BGP Route Filtering
> >     dec>hex help
> >     RE: route summarization in rip
> >     Extremely Strange Routing Problem!
> >     RE: Frame Relay
> >     Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:04:11 -0800 
> >     Re: BGP Route Filtering
> >     Re: db9 to rj45 converter
> >     SOLARIS SNMP MIB
> >     Re: BGP Route Filtering
> >     Re: db9 to rj45 converter
> >     db9 to rj45
> >     Re: Extremely Strange Routing Problem!
> (update)
> >     Re: BGP Route Filtering
> >     Re: BGP Route Filtering
> >     RE: ISL vs. 802.1Q
> >     Another basic ISDN problem
> >     Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:10:59 -0800 
> >     Re: What should I block???
> >     Re: subnet routing scheme question
> >     Idle timer followup
> >     Odd CLI behavior in 12.1(5a)E1
> >     Frame Relay Split Horizon NBMA
> >     Re: Favorite Network Sniffer
> >     Re: subnet routing scheme question
> >     Re: Frame Relay Split Horizon NBMA
> >     RE: Frame Relay
> >     Re: Favorite Network Sniffer
> >     RE: IP unnumbered and OSPF
> >     RE: IP unnumbered and OSPF
> >     Re: What should I block???(oops)
> >     Blocking LSA Type 4 and 5's
> > 
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:02:16 -0500 
> > From: "Paver, Charles"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: db9 to rj45 converter
> > 
> > Hello.  I need some advice on the DB9 to rj45
> > coverter i just bought at
> > microcenter.  The pins nor wires in the back are
> not
> > connected, so i have no
> > way of knowing which pins go to which hole in the
> > db9.  Each of the holes
> > are labeled from 1 to 9, but none of the wires
> have
> > labeling on them.  Does
> > anyone or can anyone tell me which pins I should
> > line up with their
> > respective holes?  Thanks!
> > 
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:08:13 -0500
> > From: "Santosh Koshy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: BGP Route Filtering
> > 
> > I am testing BGP in a lab
> > 
> > - ----------      ---------
> > | RA     |------| RB    |
> > - ----------      ---------
> > 
> > 1) Router A has networks 155.134.1.x, 2.x, 3.x and
> > 4.x beind it
> > 
> > 2) Router B has networks 128.128.1.x, 2.x,
> > 129.129.1.x, 2.x, 130.130.1.x
> > behind it
> > 
> > Router_A#
> > router bgp 400
> >  network 128.128.0.0
> >  neighbor 1.1.1.2 remote-as 300
> > 
> > I am just propogating 128.128.x.x across to router
> A
> > and it works fine....
> > 
> > Router_B#
> > Router bgp 300
> >  network 155.134.0.0
> >  neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 400
> > 
> > I am trying to propogate just networks 155.134.1.x
> > and 4.x to router B...
> > and I cannot seem to do it...
> > 
> > Santosh Koshy
> > Communications Analyst
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:05:37 -0600 
> > From: Hao Vu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: cd burner LAST
> > 
> > - -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan West
> > To: hao vu; 'Bradley J. Wilson'; 'cisco'
> > Sent: 2/1/01 7:33 AM
> > Subject: RE: cd burner LAST
> > 
> > OK, here is the last waste of
> > time/bits/bandwidth,etc
> > on this... Sure a positive attitude is great, and
> > being helpful is great. And I don't mind hitting
> > delete several hundred times each day....
> > 
> > BUT OFF TOPIC questions should go somewhere else.
> > - --Bottom line--. I mean the ? about the CD
> burner
> > is
> > nowhere near the target. Questions about blocking
> > Napster or how to resolve problems with Microsoft
> > domain controllers are borderline. Actually, the
> > questions about PDCs and BDCs bother me more than
> > other borderline errors.
> > 
> > I'm sure that MS has ample information about this
> > somewhere else. In fact, I bet they even have
> their
> > own study group....but maybe the people at the MS
> > groupstudy aren't as sharp as those at
> > Cisco/groupstudy... :>
> > 
> > - --- hao vu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ... That's GREAT! Thank you for your positive
> > > attitude.   ;-)
> > > 
> > > HV
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Bradley J. Wilson
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 3:55 PM
> > > To: cisco
> > > Subject: Re: cd burner
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Oh, come on folks...an off-topic post isn't any
> > skin
> > > off your back.  The
> > > topic clearly states what the author is posting
> > > about, and one more press of
> > > the "delete" button isn't going to break your
> > > keyboard.  Do you holler at
> > > co-workers when they want to talk about
> > > non-work-related issues?  Of course
> > > not.  Relax. ;-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: someone
> > > To: someone else
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:27 PM
> > > Subject: RE: cd burner
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Good to know and all, but I think it would have
> > been
> > > more appropriate posted s_o_m_e_w_h_e_r_e 
> > > e_l_s_e....
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- "Someone Q. Ciscolearner"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > As low priced as they are, the Lite-On CD
> > Burners
> > > > and Smart and Friendly
> > 
> === message truncated ===
> 
> 
> =====
> Srihari Babu
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail -
> only $35 
> a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> 
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to