It stands for "Internetwork Operating System"
A little blurb from Cisco's web site:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/ciscoios.html
- raj
""Pierre-Alex"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Do you know that the letters in "IOS" stand for? (Like in Cisco IOS 12.0)
>
> Pierre-Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 7:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fwd: failure notice
>
> Pierre
>
> This came back into my mailbox this morning.
>
> Dale
>
> --------- Forwarded Message ---------
>
> DATE: 5 Feb 2001 11:27:55 -0000
> From: MAILER-DAEMON
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi. This is the mailer-daemon. I'm afraid I wasn't able to
> deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a
> permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
> I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by mailcity.com; Fri Feb 2
> 20:37:25 2001
> To: "Pierre-Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 22:37:25 -0600
> From: "Dale Cunningham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> X-Sent-Mail: off
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Mailer: MailCity Service
> Subject: Re:
> X-Sender-Ip: 208.50.127.100
> Organization: Lycos Mail (http://mail.lycos.com:80)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Language: en
> Content-Length: 880
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Pierre
>
> I think what they are trying to say is that by using vlsms you are getting
> as much efficiency as possible out of the addressing scheme (using a .252
> for instance) so that using multipoint does not gain you anything. After
> all, you still have to have a seperate address within the subnet for each
> circuit. A .248 has six useable hosts, using multipoint with it would not
> gain you much. I would prefer to use point-to-point and use a /30 mask.
>
> Dale
> --
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:27:47
> Pierre-Alex wrote:
> >On page 14-28 (ICND) It says:
> >
> >"Multipoint may not save you addresses if you are using VLSMs"
> >
> >What is the rational behind this statement. I would think that using a
long
> >subnet mask (i.e. 255.255.255.248 ) would not waste any ip address!
> >
> >
>
>
> Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
> http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
>
> --------- End Forwarded Message ---------
>
>
>
> Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
> http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
