IOS = Internetwork Operating System
-----Original Message-----
From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Silly Question!
Do you know that the letters in "IOS" stand for? (Like in Cisco IOS 12.0)
Pierre-Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 7:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: failure notice
Pierre
This came back into my mailbox this morning.
Dale
--------- Forwarded Message ---------
DATE: 5 Feb 2001 11:27:55 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. This is the mailer-daemon. I'm afraid I wasn't able to
deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a
permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by mailcity.com; Fri Feb 2
20:37:25 2001
To: "Pierre-Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 22:37:25 -0600
From: "Dale Cunningham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sent-Mail: off
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: MailCity Service
Subject: Re:
X-Sender-Ip: 208.50.127.100
Organization: Lycos Mail (http://mail.lycos.com:80)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Language: en
Content-Length: 880
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Pierre
I think what they are trying to say is that by using vlsms you are getting
as much efficiency as possible out of the addressing scheme (using a .252
for instance) so that using multipoint does not gain you anything. After
all, you still have to have a seperate address within the subnet for each
circuit. A .248 has six useable hosts, using multipoint with it would not
gain you much. I would prefer to use point-to-point and use a /30 mask.
Dale
--
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:27:47
Pierre-Alex wrote:
>On page 14-28 (ICND) It says:
>
>"Multipoint may not save you addresses if you are using VLSMs"
>
>What is the rational behind this statement. I would think that using a long
>subnet mask (i.e. 255.255.255.248 ) would not waste any ip address!
>
>
Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
--------- End Forwarded Message ---------
Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
