Thanks Scott-

This is just what I was looking for.

-Glenn


""Scott Froese"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
96csho$un0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96csho$un0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Glenn-
>
> We have our core configured exactly as you want to do.  The following link
> details how to do it:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sft_6_1/configgd
> /redund.htm
>
> Basically, the redundant supervisors fail over automatically.  You need to
> enable a "four-way" HSRP configuration with the four MSFCs.  In our case,
we
> have the odd vlans using switch "B" as the active HSRP peer and the even
> vlans using switch "A" as the active peer.  You adjust the standby
> priorities to accomplish this:
>
> VLAN "Even"
> Switch "A", MSFC 1 (Mod 15) ==> Priority 110
> Switch "A", MSFC 2 (Mod 16) ==> Priority 109
> Switch "B", MSFC 1 (Mod 15) ==> Priority 108
> Switch "B", MSFC 2 (Mod 16) ==> Priority 107
>
> VLAN "Odd"
> Switch "A", MSFC 1 (Mod 15) ==> Priority 108
> Switch "A", MSFC 2 (Mod 16) ==> Priority 107
> Switch "B", MSFC 1 (Mod 15) ==> Priority 110
> Switch "B", MSFC 2 (Mod 16) ==> Priority 109
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Scott
>
>
> ""Glenn Allison"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 96cnp0$iq6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96cnp0$iq6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I have two Catalyst 6500's, each with an RSM in module 15 and module 16.
> > The RSM in module 15 is configured, but the module in 16 is not.  The
two
> > Catalyst 6500's have a couple VLAN's which are trunked together with
ISL,
> > and we are doing HSRP between the RSM's in module 15.  If one of the
> > Catalyst's died or if there was a problem with one of the RSM's, the
> traffic
> > would route through the other Catalyst that is still up.
> >
> > Here is my question...We want to utilize the RSM's sitting in module 16
on
> > each of the switches, and add even more redundancy to the site.  Is
there
> a
> > way to configure the RSM's so if one module died, the other one would
pick
> > up in its place, while also keeping the HSRP running between to two
> seperate
> > switches as well?
> >
> > Any ideas would be a great help, or if you have a link on Cisco's site
> that
> > handles this situation.
> >
> > Thanks-
> > Glenn Allison, CCNP, CCDA, MCSE
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to