We had had the same issues and a similiar situation. We enabled priority
queueing for a time (Which worked great) and then moved to a custom queue as
our Citrix traffic increased and started hogging all the bandwidth. This
made quite a difference of course and may be something you wanna try.
----Original Message-----
From: Germain, PJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, February 19, 2001 11:19 AM
Subject: Citrix is faster via Internet than LAN/WAN
>Hello all !
>I'm hoping someone out there can help me with this. We are stumped.
>We are running the latest version of Citrix on an 8 server ( Proliant 6400)
>farm.
>Internally, we get to it via a couple of 2948G switches and a 3660 Core
>Router.
>
>But, if I go to one of our remotes sites that has a DSL connection to the
>Internet, they access our Citrix farm through our 2612 Internet router,
then
>a Catalyst 2900 switch (DMZ), then through our PIX, then another 2948G, BUT
>they apparently bypass the 3660 and get to the farm.
>
>External access has much quicker response times than internal. The only
>difference I see is the 3660 router.
>We have 30 WAN sites and about 150 LAN hosts working through the 3660, but
>the CPU usage and Memory are not hurting. Could this difference just be a
>"traffic shaping" issue or is there something that I am just missing??? We
>have only a basic config on the 3660.
>
>Any assistance would be much appreciated.
>Thank you very much, in advance.
>
>P.J. Germain
>Network Support Engineer
>Cooper / T. Smith
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
