At 09:57 PM 2/19/01, you wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> > Extended ping will let you set the source address. Type ping and carriage
> > return and you'll see lots of parameters.
>
>Correct, as I indicated below,
Sorry, I missed that you had already tried extended pings.
> but this doesn't help regular traffic to
>get routed though.
Why is the other router not in the secondary subnets too? If it's not, then
it can't reply unless you have set up routing between the subnets (or a
static route). I don't think we really have enough info to help you.
Without more info, it sounds like spaghetti. It may be time for a redesign
of your addressing and routing (or at least a complete analysis of how it's
working now). Good luck with it.
Priscilla
>Andy
>
> >
> > At 09:45 PM 2/19/01, Andy wrote:
> >
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >Here is a senerio I'm playing with, possibly the answer is sub-interfaces,
> > >but nonetheless... I have a cisco with a primary ethernet IP address, and
> > >two secondary IP addresses. When I go to ping another router in one of the
> > >subnets of one of the secondary IP addresses, it does so with the source
> > >address of the primary address on the interface, so the other router tries
> > >to send the response up its default. If the source address was the address
> > >that was actually in the subnet it was pinging it returns ok. I tested
> > >this with replacing the source address using extended pings. Any thoughts
> > >on how to make it behave the way I want it to. Thanks.
> > >
> > >Andy
> > >
> > >
________________________
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
