This will be a suit worth watching! I wonder if it will get the same
coverage as the MS vs Justice department?? :>)
sorry.. could not help it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gayathri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated
We are suing NT Servers for DHCP.
Thanks for the ideas.
Gayathri
Mel Chandler PMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Or turn debug on and watch the communication happen.
>
> Mel L. Chandler, A+, Network+, MCNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Analyst
> Information Services
> PMI Delta Dental
> (562) 467-6627
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:44 AM
> To: 'Larry Lamb'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated
>
>
> Quick and easy way to find out if the packet is reaching each segment is
> .....
>
> On each interface i.e. interface where user is, interface where DHCP
server
> is do...
>
> ip accounting output-packets or just plain old ip accounting.
>
> you should then do show ip account.
>
> This should show you the ip address 255.255.255.255 being helpered to
> whatever your address is. At this point take a note of the mac address of
> the requester.
>
> See if it is coming through to your server.
>
> Now......If it is then the cisco devices are working properly, back to the
> drawing board.
>
> If it isn't getting to the server then come back. I have encountered a
few
> gotchas doing this before.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 February 2001 10:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated
>
>
> Everything I've found on Cisco tells me that multiple helper addresses are
> supported and I would have to assume that it's forwarding the packet to
both
> helper address and is taking the response from the first machine to
respond.
> Any chance you can define part of the scope on each server? This would
> ultimately solve the problem. Without a sniffer on both segments it's
going
> to be difficult to tell exactly what's happening unless someone has
already
> worked with this and has more input.
>
> "Gayathri" wrote in message <975b6q$d4v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Firstly, sorry for the repeated submission, I dont see my psoting under
> the
> >main heading so I am forced to post it again..
> >
> >here is my question...
> >
> > I have 2 DHCP servers and I have defined both the IP helper addressess
in
> >our routers
> >
> >Now, if a client quieries for an IP, which of the servers will respond
> >first?
> >
> >The problem I have is we have defined one subnet in DHCP Server and not
in
> >the other.
> >
> >When this user is querying for an IP , he is not getting a response.
> >
> >interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 10.X.X.X 255.255.0.0
> > ip helper-address 10.X.1.X
> > ip helper-address 10.X.1.Y
> >
> >The said subnet is defined in the DHCP server 10.102.1.Y but, still
there
> >is no response. when the client requests.
> >
> >The main reason we have 2 DHCP servers is for redundancy.
> >
> >Please note that they are independant of each other .
> >
> >Does this mean that , when the client is requesting, the router first
> >forwards to the first DHCP server and since it is not getting a response
,
> >is dropping it?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Gayathri
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
