It was a typo error, I hope u understand that
Thanks
Gayathri
Jon Krabbenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
DDBCC652E597D311BB6A009027AE9F97041E0EF7@SMV-EXCHANGE">news:DDBCC652E597D311BB6A009027AE9F97041E0EF7@SMV-EXCHANGE...
> This will be a suit worth watching! I wonder if it will get the same
> coverage as the MS vs Justice department?? :>)
>
> sorry.. could not help it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gayathri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 7:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated
>
>
> We are suing NT Servers for DHCP.
>
> Thanks for the ideas.
>
> Gayathri
>
>
>
> Mel Chandler PMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Or turn debug on and watch the communication happen.
> >
> > Mel L. Chandler, A+, Network+, MCNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCNA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Network Analyst
> > Information Services
> > PMI Delta Dental
> > (562) 467-6627
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:44 AM
> > To: 'Larry Lamb'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated
> >
> >
> > Quick and easy way to find out if the packet is reaching each segment is
> > .....
> >
> > On each interface i.e. interface where user is, interface where DHCP
> server
> > is do...
> >
> > ip accounting output-packets or just plain old ip accounting.
> >
> > you should then do show ip account.
> >
> > This should show you the ip address 255.255.255.255 being helpered to
> > whatever your address is. At this point take a note of the mac address
of
> > the requester.
> >
> > See if it is coming through to your server.
> >
> > Now......If it is then the cisco devices are working properly, back to
the
> > drawing board.
> >
> > If it isn't getting to the server then come back. I have encountered a
> few
> > gotchas doing this before.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 23 February 2001 10:15
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated
> >
> >
> > Everything I've found on Cisco tells me that multiple helper addresses
are
> > supported and I would have to assume that it's forwarding the packet to
> both
> > helper address and is taking the response from the first machine to
> respond.
> > Any chance you can define part of the scope on each server? This would
> > ultimately solve the problem. Without a sniffer on both segments it's
> going
> > to be difficult to tell exactly what's happening unless someone has
> already
> > worked with this and has more input.
> >
> > "Gayathri" wrote in message <975b6q$d4v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >Firstly, sorry for the repeated submission, I dont see my psoting
under
> > the
> > >main heading so I am forced to post it again..
> > >
> > >here is my question...
> > >
> > > I have 2 DHCP servers and I have defined both the IP helper addressess
> in
> > >our routers
> > >
> > >Now, if a client quieries for an IP, which of the servers will respond
> > >first?
> > >
> > >The problem I have is we have defined one subnet in DHCP Server and not
> in
> > >the other.
> > >
> > >When this user is querying for an IP , he is not getting a response.
> > >
> > >interface Ethernet0
> > > ip address 10.X.X.X 255.255.0.0
> > > ip helper-address 10.X.1.X
> > > ip helper-address 10.X.1.Y
> > >
> > >The said subnet is defined in the DHCP server 10.102.1.Y but, still
> there
> > >is no response. when the client requests.
> > >
> > >The main reason we have 2 DHCP servers is for redundancy.
> > >
> > >Please note that they are independant of each other .
> > >
> > >Does this mean that , when the client is requesting, the router first
> > >forwards to the first DHCP server and since it is not getting a
response
> ,
> > >is dropping it?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Gayathri
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_________________________________
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
