> >and the reason an ISP would be considered "clueless" for using RFC1918 on >internal point to points is..........? > >Brian > Let's see... It confuses troubleshooting because valid routes may appear to be looping, with the same address traversed more than once. The addresses can't be resolved with reverse DNS. It breaks MTU path discovery. It violates the spirit of RFC 2827 and reverse path verification. _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Private Internet Addressing Brant Stevens
- RE: Private Internet Addressing Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: Private Internet Addressing Leigh Anne Chisholm
- Re: Private Internet Addressing J Roysdon
- RE: Private Internet Addressing Wang, Roger
- RE: Private Internet Addressing Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: Private Internet Addressing Kevin Wigle
- Re: Private Internet Addressing Brian
- Re: Private Internet Addressing Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: Private Internet Addressing Bradley J. Wilson
- RE: Private Internet Addressing Kane, Christopher A.
- RE: Private Internet Addressing: MTU Path Discov... Peter Van Oene
- RE: Private Internet Addressing Brian
- Re: Private Internet Addressing Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: Private Internet Addressing Howard C. Berkowitz

