>On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote:
>
>> Where I'm located, it seems that "major" ISP's are being bought
>> left-right-and-center. I would think that with some of the
>> acquisitions that have been made, what could have been a simple
>> "merging" of networks would get a little ugly, trying to remove the
>> duplicate "private internet addressing" routes from all the providers,
>> replacing these configurations with new addressing schemes.
>>
>> Or am I still missing the boat? (-:
Brian Feeny wrote,
>
>This is common in both Enterprise and ISP situations. NAT can be made to
>deal with this. When two networks have duplicate private addressing, you
>can use NAT to remedy this.
Specifically, double NAT, where each former enterprise maps into a
private DMZ, so translations between the enterprises do not require
coordination between them, just with the NAT administrator.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
