Should the logon time be so long even if I telnet by numeric address, say
telnet xx.yy.zz.ww ?



Regards


// luis oliveira



> At 04:27 PM 4/12/01 -0400, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> 
>> Our machines have fixed IP addresses. We are experimenting a problem when
we
>> try to telnet a Unix machine. It takes forever (almost half a minute). The
>> same problem with e-mail checking ( 30 seconds to logon on the server).
>> Before we had just two subnets. Now we have more (private networks), and
the
>> mail server is on a public network (DMZ) separated from us by a firewall.
We
>> think that the problem is related with the Ciscos or the implementation of
>> the VLAN's. The company that implemented our network (which is a sister
>> company of my company) until now as not found a solution to our problem
and
>> the mail users, which is everyone is becoming very upset with all this.
>> Everything else works fine on the network works fine (copying files,
browse
>> the internet, that kind of stuff).
>> 
>> Anyone have seen this kind of trouble before ? Can give some advice or
steps
>> to follow to eliminate this ?
>> 
>> Sorry for the long post.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> // luis oliveira
> 
> Hm.  It sounds a lot like DNS issues.  Do you have guys pointing to an
> internal DNS server?  Does your mail server resolve to an internal IP?  If
> you do internal DNS, I can see where you might have "inside has problems",
> "outside is dandy" problems.  Can you time the telnetting to the Unix
> box?  Are you sure it is not 75 seconds?  (If it is, it is almost
> definitely DNS issues).  Have you tried doing "ping" floods to those hosts
> just to see what % of packet loss occurs, if any?  It could very well be
> other issues, but check your DNS setups to see if anything seems fishy with
> your internal DNS.
> 
> -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=402&t=392
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to