Thanks for the corrections, Michael.

Chuck, PacBell/SBC likes to do that sort of thing.  Nice and insecure.  Of
course, they also tell customers to put public IPs on desktops and don't
bother to mention anything about a firewall ;-)

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/



""Chuck Larrieu""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If I were to guess, I would say that the telco is pitching an all frame
> relay solution as a way to keep costs down, telling the customer he can
> terminate everything on a single router. there is always the question
about
> the wisdom of terminating an internet connection on the same router that
> connects all parts of your inside network....
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Munoz, Michael
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Frame-Relay Sub interface question [7:4432]
>
> All you should really need from the carrier is the pvc information, and
even
> then you should be able to see the local dlci's with inverse arp..  You
will
> also want to know the LMI type, we always use ANSI unless specifically
> requested.  Some of you may think that the new version of Cisco IOS
detects
> the LMI type automatically but I have seen this not happen on more then on
> occasion!
>
> Also, configuring your dlci for IETF is only when you are connecting a
cisco
> router on one end of the circuit and some other vendor's router on the
other
> end.  It doesn't matter what the Frame Relay switches are.
>
> I'm also wondering about you using Frame Relay to access the internet and
> not HDLC but that was not your question...
>
> Here is more info about configuring frame relay from Cisco:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/wan_c
> /wcfrelay.htm
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Munoz
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Roysdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Frame-Relay Sub interface question [7:4432]
>
>
> Nope.  You'll have your DLCI's anyway, and that's really it.  You could
ask
> them if they've got Cisco FR switches at both ends so you know if you need
> to configure 'encap frame IETF' or can leave it to the default using Cisco
> FR encapsulation (allows for more options, especially with VoIP/FR), but
> that won't really affect a simple FR Data network.
>
> --
> Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
> List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
>
>
>
> ""Richie, Nathan""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I want to connect 2 remote sites to a corporate site with Frame-relay
> links
> > and the corporate site to the Internet with a Frame-relay link.  My
> question
> > is this:  Do I need anything from the carrier (or does the carrier need
to
> > configure anything) to utilize sub-interfaces?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nathan
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4461&t=4432
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to