next time you recomend using bgp to fix an IGP problem, im going to.., well, uh, just dont do it again. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:38 AM Subject: RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076] > Run BGP on all routers and manipulate the path with local preference or > weights or meds? > > Static routes? > > Change to EIGRP? > > Disconnect the link from A to C? > > Put router B into area 1? > > Sure - a tunnel will work also > > Sorry, I've been reading too many things this weekend. > > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Kevin Schwantz > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076] > > routerA routerB > AREA0--------AREA0 > | | > routerC routerD > AREA1---------AREA1 > > > Since we are on the topic of OSPF, could someone help me out on the scenario > above? > Routers A and B have interfaces in Area 0 and Area1. I want traffic from > routerA destined for routerD to go via router B. This is not the case in my > network because I realise that routerA prefers Intra-Area routes and thus > would route traffic to routerD via routerC. > What tweaks must I make in order to force the traffic from routerA to > routerD to go via routerB ? Someone suggested building a GRE tunnel between > routerA and routerB and then configure the tunnel to be in AREA1. > Any suggestions? > Kevin > > ""W. Alan Robertson"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Guys, > > > > The actual traffic will not be routed up to area 0... Area 0 has been > > extended > > down to R2, so R2 is now a backbone router. R2 has interfaces in 3 areas > > now: > > Area1, Area2, and Area0 by means of it's virtual link. > > > > Any traffic originating in Area2 destined for Area1 will be routed > directly > > by > > R2. This satisfies the "Interarea traffic must traverse the backbone" > rule, > > because R2 *is* a backbone router. > > > > This is not theory... It is fact. > > > > Alan > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andrew Larkins" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 10:13 AM > > Subject: RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076] > > > > > > > agreed....to area 0 then on to the intended area > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 28 May 2001 15:50 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076] > > > > > > > > > Chuck- my answer is Yes. The traffic from the Virtual Linked psuedo-ABR > > > passes back to Area 0, before it's sent onto the intended Area (even if > > it's > > > directly connected). > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Chuck Larrieu > > > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 8:59 PM > > > Subject: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076] > > > > > > > > > > Ever wonder what the CCIE candidates talk about on the CCIE list? > > > > > > > > The following message came through today. I thought the bright folks > on > > > this > > > > list might be curious, and might want to venture an answer. > > > > > > > > Begin original question: > > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > I wonder if there is anybody who remembers the discussion on Virtual > > > > Links in OSPF. It was posted some time ago but I can't seem to find > it. > > > > > > > > The scenario was something like this: > > > > ________ _______ _______ > > > > |Area 0 | |Area1| |Area2| > > > > | R0 |--| R1 |--| R2 | > > > > |______| |_____| |_____| > > > > > > > > There is a virtual link from area 2 to Area 0 via Area1. Traffic needs > to > > > > get to R1 in Area 1 from R2 in Area 2. Assume that the virtual link > has > > to > > > > use R1 (To create the V.Link). Does the traffic flow passed R1 (in > Area > > 1) > > > > to Area 0 and then back to area 1, or does the actual flow just to R1 > > from > > > > R2. > > > > > > > > I cant remember the conclusion, and I cant seem to find it on the > > > archives. > > > > Quite interesting issues. > > > > > > > > End of original question > > > > > > > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > One IOS to forward them all. > > > > One IOS to find them. > > > > One IOS to summarize them all > > > > And in the routing table bind them. > > > > > > > > -JRR Chambers- > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6235&t=6076 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076]
Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Tue, 29 May 2001 08:01:58 -0700
- Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076... Chuck Larrieu
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... W. Alan Robertson
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Circusnuts
- RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Andrew Larkins
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... W. Alan Robertson
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Kevin Schwantz
- RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Chris Larson
- RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Chuck Larrieu
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... EA Louie
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Kevin Schwantz
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Kevin Schwantz
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... David Chandler
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... James Haynes
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Kevin Schwantz
- RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Hire, Ejay
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... W. Alan Robertson
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
- Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This On... Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist