Final results of some search:
> >For information (using my father's notes) the CCITT
> >books-of-recommendations' colors were the following:
> >- green in 1972,
> >- yellow in 1980,
> >- red in 1984
> >- blue in 1988 (last 4-year-book).
>
> mutters because I distinctly remember an Orange Book. 1976?
I have missed 1976 - cannot find it in notes and ITU-T site does not
help either. Let's make it orange??? (Actually none of the recs from
that book are valid any more, as opposed to recs from Blue, Red and
Yellow books - which proves Orange simply must be older.)
>
> You are quite correct that there was evolution, including in the OSI
> Reference Model itself. Especially important (don't have numbers in
> front of me) were the Internal Organization of the Network Layer and
> the OSI Routeing Framework. Once one understands these
> specifications, many of the arguments over "what layer does XXX go
> into" disappear, because the definitions of layers have evolved.
> Look at ISO 8880 and 8881, CONS over Ethernet and CLNP over X.25.
>
Is the referred document a technical report?:
ISO/IEC TR 9575:1995 Information technology -- Telecommunications and
information exchange between systems -- OSI Routeing Framework
> > >
> >
> >> LLC 3
My 802.2 document is the original
> IEEE hard cover specification. There's no question there were MIBs
> for MAP/Enhanced Performance Architecture/etc.; I worked on
> conformance testers for them, especially their management. I will
> observe that most of these MIBs were not written as IETF-style SMI,
> but OSI GDMO.
>
I have downloaded the latest ANSI/IEEE Std 802.2, 1998 Edition - and
Type 3 is indeed specified there.
Rita
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8638&t=8262
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
