Wasn't having a go but I think you were too specific and pinned exactly down
to who you are and where you are etc etc, somebody will go sniffing just for
the kicks.
Karl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sammi"
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed Network Design [7:10494]
> Sorry if I sounded abrupt, wasn't meant that way.
>
> Fact is, *I* don't see that it'd compromise security, so that doesn't
> mean it doesn't in fact make a difference.
> My thinking was; if someone could get to my internal network they'd
> find that out quick enough.
> I appreciate the thought, and if there's room for criticism there,
> then that's exactly what I'm looking for.
>
> Constructive criticism is a great learning tool IMO.
>
> On 30 Jun 2001 10:22:48 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("hal9001")
> wrote:
>
> >I.E. None then!
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Sammi"
> >To:
> >Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 2:36 PM
> >Subject: Re: Proposed Network Design [7:10494]
> >
> >
> >> On 30 Jun 2001 08:50:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("hal9001") wrote:
> >>
> >> >Sammi,
> >> >
> >> >This may be a bit ungracious but how is your security as it seems now
> >that
> >> >we have all the plans?
> >>
> >> Don't see that it'd be any different.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10521&t=10494
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
