Uhhh, what?
wic-1t is sync serial.
you can clock it at up to four megs.
there are e1 dsu s that can clock up to 2 megs onto the v35 connection, and
then there are dsus that actually can map timeslotsfrom multiple e1/t1s onto
a single serial interface.

for instance, the kentrox opera.

of course, when you hook up the wic-1t to a dsu, it is dte, and therefore
you should not need to configure clocking on it.

all of your config is on the dsu

-----Original Message-----
From: Burnham, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: line speed [7:11911]


It seem my earleir question either confused everyone or basically didn't
interest anyone.
To put it in a nutshell.This is what I need to find out.

Cisco state that a Synchronous Serial interface, eg. a WIC-1T will run up to
2.048 mbps
HOW can you get this line speed to a Synch serial interface ?? eg. n x 64,
e1 etc ????????????

I need to know ASAP


Chris Burnham,
Systems Engineer,
Delphis Consulting Plc.
Tel:   +(44) 020 7916 0200
Mob: +(44) 07799403576
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged.
Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC ["Delphis"] and they
must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If
you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may
not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from
your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure.  Delphis does
not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have
been sent.  Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the
author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11931&t=11911
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to