Excerpt from a Cisco page

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ssr921/rn_rt921/670
85.htm
Cisco 2500 Console Ports
Cisco router console ports do not support software (XON/XOFF) or hardware
(RTS/CTS) flow control. However, on all routers except the Cisco 2500
series, the console port is wired to connect RTS and CTS. This means that a
terminal using hardware flow control sees CTS in response to asserting RTS,
and communication between the terminal and the router works properly.
On the Cisco 2500 series, this is not possible. The result is one-way-only
communication between the terminal and the Cisco 2500 console port: you will
be able to see output from the router on the terminal, but you cannot type
anything in. The workaround is to disable hardware flow control on the
terminal or to strap the CTS high.
 


 -----Original Message-----
From:   Eugene Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:17 AM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: Dead 2501 - further update [7:11865]

Its a hyperterm thing, play with the connection settings, emulation and such
and it should start working.  I've seen where Hyperterm is set to auto and
it detects the emulation wrong and I have also seen where hyperterm is set
correctly and is doesn't work unless set to auto.  At very least download
the free hyperterm upgrade, or better yet find a better term program (at
leat thats what everyone says, I try not to rely on other programs since you
can't take anything with you to a CCIE lab you might was well learn on the
minimum)

Eugene

""Dennis Laganiere""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I hooked it up to my terminal server and it works regardless of the
> HyperTerm settings.  Since that's the only way I ever use it, I guess it's
a
> difference that makes no difference, so no harm no foul...
>
> I still would like to know why... Is it a ROM version or something?  If
> anybody knows, please pass it along.
>
> And again, thank you Mr. Jensen for for fixing my problem...
>
> --- Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Laganiere
> To: 'Ole Drews Jensen '; Dennis Laganiere; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
> Sent: 7/10/2001 8:21 PM
> Subject: RE: Dead 2501 [7:11865]
>
> That did it.  I made a new HyperTerminal session with "none" instead of
> "hardware" and it worked great.  I hacked the password, but didn't see
> anything strange in the config.  I went ahead and cleared the config and
> rebooted; same thing.
>
> If anybody knows why this happens, I'd be curious to know; but in the
> mean time, thanks Mr. Jensen, you're my guru of the day... :-)
>
> --- Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ole Drews Jensen
> To: 'Dennis Laganiere'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 7/10/2001 8:02 PM
> Subject: RE: Dead 2501 [7:11865]
>
> Yes, I have seen that some routers has to have NONE in flow control
> instead
> of HARDWARE. I have four routers, but in order for me to talk with all
> four
> via my console cable, I have to configure my Hyper Terminal with
> 9600,N,8,1,NONE. If I set it to 9600,N,8,1,HARDWARE, I can only talk
> with
> three of them (?????).
>
> Also, be sure to connect it to the CONSOLE port and not the AUX.
>
> Hth,
>
> Ole
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Ole Drews Jensen
>  Systems Network Manager
>  CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
>  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  NEED A JOB ???
>  http://www.oledrews.com/job
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dead 2501 [7:11865]
>
>
> I just got a 2501 off of ebay and it seems to boot up OK, but it won't
> accept any commands from the keyboard.  The console speed is right,
> otherwise I wouldn't be able to see the boot process.  I was able to
> issue a
> control-break and it started at the ">" prompt, but even there, no
> keyboard.
> I hooked up another router to the console cable to make sure it wasn't
> the
> PC, but that router worked fine.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --- Dennis
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto.  Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the
official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by it.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11963&t=11865
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to