They had to release a new Standards Track RFC just to say that RFC 1700 is 
obsolete? That's pretty funny. ;-)

Priscilla

At 10:32 AM 8/28/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>Just to complicate things a bit:
>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories.
>
>
>         Title           : Assigned Numbers: RFC 1700 is Obsolete
>         Author(s)       : J. Reynolds et al.
>         Filename        : draft-rfc-editor-rfc1700bis-00.txt
>         Pages           : 3
>         Date            : 15-Aug-01
>
>This memo obsoletes RFC 1700 (STD 2) 'Assigned Numbers', which
>contained an October 1994 snapshot of assigned Internet protocol
>parameters.
>
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-rfc1700bis-00.txt
>
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username
>"anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in,
>type "cd internet-drafts" and then
>         "get draft-rfc-editor-rfc1700bis-00.txt".
>
>
>
>
> >Hopefully you know enough about or can find out enough about your
> >application to see whether it uses tcp or udp or both.
> >
> >Brian "Sonic" Whalen
> >Success = Preparation + Opportunity
> >
> >
> >On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Ednilson Rosa wrote:
> >
> >>  The problem with this list is that every application seem to use both
UDP
> >>  and TCP, which is not always true.
> >>
> >>  Ednilson Rosa
> >>
> >>  ----- Original Message -----
> >>  From: "Brian Whalen"
> >>  To:
> >>  Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:03 PM
> >>  Subject: Re: access-list & ports ( TCP /UDP) [7:17374]
> >>
> >>
> >>  I use http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers for finding out
about
> >>  port numbers.  Re the dns topic below, udp is fine for a company that
>does
> >>  not have its own dns servers and only makes queries.  TCP is used for
>zone
> >>  transfers.  I believe that in newer versions of bind, random hi port
> >>  numbers are used.
> >>
> >>  Brian "Sonic" Whalen
> >>  Success = Preparation + Opportunity
> >>
> >>
> >>  On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, shella kevin wrote:
> >>
> >>  > when dealing with access-list we use both TCP & UDP. For example we
use
> >>  > tcp 53 or udp 53 for domain.
> >>  >
> >>  > My Q is when & how we know when we should use UDP and when TCP
>.........
> >>  > what is the difference .
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > Thanks
> >>  >
> >>  > Shella K.
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>  >
> >>  > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17579&t=17374
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to