I can't say 100% why this is, but imagine if you configure a switchport to
be a trunk link, and at the same time expect it to handle regular ethernet
traffic over the same line (along with the trunked signal)
Mike W.
"Sean Knox" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> That's what I thought. Is this because the main interface needs to be
> bridging? If not, what is the reasoning behind this?
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
>
> ""Baker, Jason"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > yes there is amjor flaw in your config.
> >
> > if you are using vlans which means subinterfaces, if you put an IP
address
> > on the main interface
> > it will not work.
> >
> > so remove the ip address on interface 1/0 and you should be fine.
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sean Knox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2001 7:39 am
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: VLAN configuration question [7:18696]
> > >
> > > On a Cisco router/switch running IOS with VLAN capabilities (i.e.
8500)
> > > can
> > > a physical interface have an IP address if a subinterface off the same
> > > physical interface has an IP and is actively participating in a VLAN?
> i.e.
> > >
> > > Router(enable)# conf t
> > > Router(config)# interface 1/0
> > > Router(config-if)# ip addr 10.10.10.50 255.255.255.0
> > > Router(config-if)# interface 1/0.1
> > > Router(config-if)# ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> > > Router(config-if)# encapsulation dot1q 15
> > >
> > > Are there any problems forthcoming in this setup? I seem to remember
> there
> > > was, but I have no equipment to verify this.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Sean
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18723&t=18696
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
