I wanted it done! :-) Seriously, it's not really clear but it's going
to save me a lot of time and energy down the road. Because our
addressing scheme is standardized, certain types of equipment will have
similar IP addressing. In this case, we're configuring VoIP and the
voice traffic will always originate from the .32 subnet (/27 mask) of
some network that starts with 10.x.20y.
so, when configuring LLQ and I want to create a map class for this
traffic, I only need to use a one line access list. It's crazy but in
this case it will work. Here's the access list I came up with:
permit 10.0.200.32 0.255.7.31
>>> "Gareth Hinton" 9/14/01 2:47:40 PM
>>>
You're having a laugh. Is that a Friday Funny? Who wanted that done?
Why?
Using the - Cheat, do it in your head, get it terribly wrong method:
access list 101 permit ip any 10.0.200.32 0.255.55.31
Too many beers in to Friday night to check it, or even think about it.
I'll
regret posting this tomorrow.
Gaz
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I just had to write the ugliest access list I've ever personally
> configured. I had to allow the following traffic:
>
> - First octet must be 10
> - Second octect can be anything
> - Third octect must start with 200
> - Fourth octet must be in the .32 subnet, assuming a /27 mask
length.
>
> Using a single permit statement, how would you write this? I know
how
> I did it, but for those of you needing some access list practice
(and
> who actually feel like doing this sort of exercise at this time),
I'd
> like to see how you would do it.
>
> Regards,
> John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20019&t=19996
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
