The OSI model clearly needs to be replaced by something else.
It is by far the most abused/misused way of describing networking
concepts and ideas.
If the OSI model helps you plan/design, install, support/administer
any network idea/concept/technology -- all the better. If you spend
your waking hours thinking how every network idea/concept/technology
fits into the OSI model, there is something clearly wrong with you.
And IMO, I personally think that tests should not include anything
about the OSI model. It's important to know it, but there are much
greater things to know in networking like protocol specifics. I'd much
rather know how OSPF/RIP/BGP work than what layer they 'primarily'
function on.
Also, please try to refrain from using all capital letters when making
stupid posts that are meaningless to this list.
-dre
""Tribavan Raina"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all..
>
> The answers which we got for this question were wrong.I consulted the
CISCO
> PRESS BOOK JEFF DOYLE ROUTING TCP/IP
>
> 1)RIP,BGP ARE AT APPLICATION LAYER ,PAGE 31 CHAPTER GUESS 1OR 2.
>
> 2)OSPF AT TRANSPORT.
> Any reasonings..
>
> regds
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21229&t=21226
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
