You don't say how your routing, strictly default or full BGP. If full BGP let the packets take the best path, if default set up two default and load share per destination and I wouldn't get too hung up about some asymetrical routing.
But if you insist, policy routing is for you. Dave RAJESH AGNIHOTRI wrote: > > Greetings to All ... > > I would highly appreciate if some one can help me out this problem... > > Basically we have connectivity to two ISP in India.We have different IP > address give by the different ISP. > > 1> 202.169.191.128/29 > 2>164.164.89.80/28 ... These are the lan ip address give to use by the > ISP... we have 2610 router with to serial interface and on Ethernet > interface. > > Now we wanted to configure this router in such a way that any packet comming > from 164.164.89.80/28 should be routed its respective ISP > and any packet comming from 202.169.191.128/28 network should be routed to > respective ISP. > > we have give both the ip address on the eth.. > one of ISP 164 AND ISP 202 ..... SECONDRY .. > > can any one help us out on this > > Line of reply is highly appreciated > > Regards > > RajesH Agnihotri > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21846&t=21827 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]