----- Original Message ----- From: "routerjocky" To: Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:21 PM Subject: Re: OSPF-Doyle Vol 1 pp 531-533 [7:22021]
> > Yes, > > Doyle clearly points out that even when the network 172.19.35.15 > > Statement is removed, this secondary address CAN be advertised in > > OSPF as long as the primary is running OSPF, although the secondary > > Will not be able to source Hellos. > > NO absolutely NOT TRUE! If he did, then it needs to be added to the errata > of the book. How can you even think that it would be advertised without a > network statement in OSPF? think about that one for just a second... > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > Having trouble posting? Read: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22176&t=22021 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
