How is Checkpoints pricing to that of Cisco?



On Friday, November 2, 2001, at 09:56 AM, Jim Brown wrote:

> CheckPoint = (great product) - (any support infrastructure).
>
> It is without a doubt the least supported product by a manufacturer I 
> have
> ever seen. I have outstanding TAC cases over a year old! They charge a
> fortune for support and maintenance, which you must have, and you get
> nothing for it.
>
> The only thing that actually keeps it running are the private boards and
> mailing lists.
>
> It is extremely easy to use though and they own 60% of the market?
>
> There are things you can do with CheckPoint that Cisco cannot even 
> begin to
> emulate.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT: worst company [7:25033]
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I had a very bad experience with Checkpoint and am
> wondering if anyone had the same problem.
>
> One of my clients wanted to try Checkpoint VPN-1 so I
> filled out online eval form a month ago. A sales rep
> called me the next day and said a reseller would
> contact me in 5-10 days (5-10 minutes would make more
> sense). I didn't hear nothing in 3 weeks so I filled
> out online eval form again (I lost that rep's phone
> number) and another sales rep called me said the same
> thing. Now another week passed and I still didn't hear
> nothing.
>
> My client is very unhappy so he decide to go with
> Cisco. Is Checkpoint's business so good that they
> couldn't handle or what? Anyway, Checkpoint lost my
> client and I would never work with them again.
>
> Jim
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com
-ck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25072&t=25033
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to