You can read RFC 2328 or John T Moy's OSPF Anatomy of a Routing Protocol to find that answer. I'll dig through them and see if I can find you an answer if no one else comes up with one sooner.
HTH, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Cisco Breaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311] As I said before I implemented equal load balancing on Motorola and Cisco what I want to know is, Is it possible to configure OSPF unequal load balancing ? You are saying that OSPF unequal load balancing can not be done on cisco I know that. The reason why I asked the question is cause I know that cisco can not do but is it the OSPF behaviour not to implement unequal load balancing or is it belong to Cisco's OSPF implementation? My guess is OSPF. Best regards, ""Ralph Fudamak"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't know how Motorola implements OSPF, but with Cisco's > implementation you can not do unequal cost load balancing with OSPF. This > is not to say that you can't manually change the metrics on the links to > appear to be equal cost. Keep in mind that this load balancing is *equal* > then. Your slow link will get as much traffic as your fast one, which could > cause a bottleneck. See if there is some command to set a default cost on > the link, then set them both the same. > > Hope this helps > > ""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I implemented OSPF load balancing but never done unequal load balancing. > My > > customer wants Unequal loadbalancing on Motorola routers. As I know > Unequal > > load balancing cant be implemented on Cisco without policy-map? Any > > suggestions or any info? > > > > Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27337&t=27311 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]