It does work with Cisco routers, but it's a new feature in 12.2. 
Hmm...it may even be 12.2T, not 12.2, but it is definitely available
now.

>>> "VoIP Guy"  11/30/01 7:44:28 AM >>>
It doesn't work in Cisco routers.

""Carroll Kong""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Law of subnets is a tradeoff.  Bigger subnets, have higher
> efficiency, at the cost of bigger broadcast domains.  Smaller subnets
have
> abysmal efficiency, at the benefit of smaller broadcast domains.
>          /31 is a new RFC proposed rule which eliminates the loss of
> effiency of 50% to.. 0%.
>          /30 has 2 usable addresses but loses 2 for broadcast and
> network.  So, you need 4 ips to make the subnet, but you only can
use
> 2.  50% efficiency.  /31 is going to let you take 2, and use 2, and
ignore
> the broadcast and network need.  This is ideal for point to point.
>
> At 08:32 AM 11/30/01 -0500, VoIP Guy wrote:
> >Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useable addresses
in a
> >/30, and only 2 interfaces participating in a point-to-point link,
so how
> >are there 50% of the addresses wasted.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the
> > > avaivalable addresses.
> > >
> > >   Dave
> > >
> > > Nicolas FEVRIER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi group,
> > > >
> > > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets...
> > > > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an
interface
?
> > > >
> > > > Thanxx.
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas.
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27817&t=27742
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to