>I hear that argument a lot, "if you never plan to use another
>vendor...".  It's really quite specious as it's not at all difficult to
>cutover from routing EIGRP to OSPF or vis versa if the need arises. 
>
>   Not only are Cisco's multi protocol, they are multi routing protocol
>routers. To convert simply enable both protocols.  Once they are both up
>and running get rid of routing protocol that fell from your favor,
>wallah, done.
>
>    MHO Dave


True, but unless you already have a legacy desktop routing protocol 
base, how likely is it to need the Appletalk and Novell capabilities, 
now that both those upper layer suites are native IP?

>
>Patrick Ramsey wrote:
>>
>>  IMHO, EIGRP is the better of the two.  But it's also IMHO that one should
>>  never stray from the standards.  If you know without a doubt that no
matter
>>  what happens, you will stay a cisco shop, then eigrp offers more
>>  functionallity.  Remember also cisco suggests 50 routers in one area, so
>>  proper planning needs to be done for your edge routers and core routers.
>>
>>  -Patrick
>>
>>  Or you can say screw it and use static routes!  : )
>>
>>  >>> "Mears, Rob"  12/12/01 03:54PM >>>
>>  Hi all,
>>
>>  We are in the middle of building out a new ATM network for the Core and
on
>>  the outside we are going to be running about 80 3640 or 2600.  We are in
a
>>  big debate about the routing protocol, we are currently EIGRP.
>>
>>  I have collected lots of info off Cisco's Web site about the two but
wanted
>>  to hear it from the Engineers in the trenches.
>>  What's your take on it? If it were you what would you run (EIGRP, OSPF)
and
>>  why?
>>
>>  Thanks
>>  Rob
>--
>David Madland
>Sr. Network Engineer
>CCIE# 2016
>Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>612-664-3367
>
>"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29006&t=28966
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to