Yes dave
Ben Liang Tan wrote: > > Dave, > when you said "multi IP routing protocols" does it mean a router runs RIP, > EIGRP, OSPF/BGP within 1 or more interfaces? > TIA. > > BL Tan > > >From: "MADMAN" > >Reply-To: "MADMAN" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: OSPF or EIGRP [7:28966] > >Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:28:11 -0500 > > > >"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > > > > > >I hear that argument a lot, "if you never plan to use another > > > >vendor...". It's really quite specious as it's not at all difficult to > > > >cutover from routing EIGRP to OSPF or vis versa if the need arises. > > > > > > > > Not only are Cisco's multi protocol, they are multi routing protocol > > > >routers. To convert simply enable both protocols. Once they are both > >up > > > >and running get rid of routing protocol that fell from your favor, > > > >wallah, done. > > > > > > > > MHO Dave > > > > > > True, but unless you already have a legacy desktop routing protocol > > > base, how likely is it to need the Appletalk and Novell capabilities, > > > now that both those upper layer suites are native IP? > > > > > > > I think you may have misunderstood my statement and I probably wasn't > >exactly clear > >but when I said "multi routing protocol routers" I meant multi IP routing > >protocols:) > > > > I think that addresses your statement. > > > > Dave > > > >David Madland > >CCIE# 2016 > >Senior Network Engineer > >Qwest Communications > >612-664-3367 > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29069&t=28966 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
