Dave, when you said "multi IP routing protocols" does it mean a router runs RIP, EIGRP, OSPF/BGP within 1 or more interfaces? TIA.
BL Tan >From: "MADMAN" >Reply-To: "MADMAN" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: OSPF or EIGRP [7:28966] >Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:28:11 -0500 > >"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > > > >I hear that argument a lot, "if you never plan to use another > > >vendor...". It's really quite specious as it's not at all difficult to > > >cutover from routing EIGRP to OSPF or vis versa if the need arises. > > > > > > Not only are Cisco's multi protocol, they are multi routing protocol > > >routers. To convert simply enable both protocols. Once they are both >up > > >and running get rid of routing protocol that fell from your favor, > > >wallah, done. > > > > > > MHO Dave > > > > True, but unless you already have a legacy desktop routing protocol > > base, how likely is it to need the Appletalk and Novell capabilities, > > now that both those upper layer suites are native IP? > > > > I think you may have misunderstood my statement and I probably wasn't >exactly clear >but when I said "multi routing protocol routers" I meant multi IP routing >protocols:) > > I think that addresses your statement. > > Dave > >David Madland >CCIE# 2016 >Senior Network Engineer >Qwest Communications >612-664-3367 _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29036&t=28966 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
