You guys peering with each others loopbacks with 2 equal cost routes to get
there??
Bri
----- Original Message -----
From: "MADMAN"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: BGP and ip load-sharing [7:28960]
> Again I only see a single neighbor, not dual homed, therefore two
> default routes would suffice. Your customer may have two providers but
> that has no bearing on you a far as needing BGP though it seems to me
> you would be the customer as the dual connected seems more likely to be
> upstream but I obviously don't have the big picture..
>
> Dave
>
> Alejandro Acosta wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Thanks for answering me.
> > I am using BGP because we have 2 Internet access and my customer
> > has 2 providers too. Then, we have to use BGP
> >
> > This is the BGP configuration
> >
> > neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx description eBGP with Mycustomer
> > neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ebgp-multihop 2
> > neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx password 7 -----
> > neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx update-source Loopback1
> > neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx version 4
> > neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx maximum-prefix 8
> >
> > I don't know why the packets that I am sending to my customer are
> > not simetric in both links. However, the customer sends to me almost
> > the same amount of traffic in both interfaces
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Alejandro
> >
> > MADMAN wrote:
> > >
> > > First problem, BGP doesn't load share but with IOS you can source an
> > > interface like a loopback, see BGP and loadsharing.
> > >
> > > If you have two parallel paths to a single provider why are you
doing
> > > BGP??? Since you choose BGP I'll assume this is an Internet
connection,
> > > set up two default routes, ip cef global command and the configs you
> > > have sent and you will have symetrical outgoing loadsharing.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > Alejandro Acosta wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > This is my first message in the list.
> > > > I am running a BGP session with a customer. It has 2 serial links
> with us
> > > > (Each link of 2 Mbps). The customer and me have selected per-packet
> sharing
> > > > in order to balanced the link.
> > > > In this moment, the traffic that comes from the customer is very
> simetric
> > > > in both links, however, the traffic that is sent to the customer
from
> us is
> > > > not simetric. As far as I know (if I am not wrong), if we are using
> load
> > > > balacing per-packet, the incoming and outgoing traffic should be
very
> very
> > > > similar, right?. Why only the incoming traffic is simetric in this
> moment.
> > > >
> > > > This is the configuration for both interfaces in my router:
> > > >
> > > > interface Serial2/0
> > > > description Link 1
> > > > bandwidth 2048
> > > > ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > ip load-sharing per-packet
> > > > no ip mroute-cache
> > > > load-interval 30
> > > > no cdp enable
> > > > hold-queue 1024 out
> > > > !
> > > >
> > > > interface Serial2/4
> > > > description Link number 2
> > > > bandwidth 2048
> > > > ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > ip load-sharing per-packet
> > > > no ip mroute-cache
> > > > load-interval 30
> > > > no fair-queue
> > > > no cdp enable
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Alejandro Acosta
> > > >
> > > > P.D. I am using IOS 12.0(7)T
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> --
> David Madland
> Sr. Network Engineer
> CCIE# 2016
> Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 612-664-3367
>
> "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29102&t=28960
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
